Agent Network Protocol (ANP)

tom@tomrochette.com (Tom Rochette) — Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000

ANP (Agent Network Protocol) is an open-source protocol suite for connecting agents on the open web, built on DID-based identity, description and discovery documents, and end-to-end encrypted messaging profiles.

ANP is the only protocol in this index betting that agent-to-agent interconnection should be decentralized and web-native rather than mediated by enterprise platforms, and after two years it has the spec depth to show for it and almost none of the adoption, and I read that mismatch as the bet’s unproven state.

What it is
#

A versioned specification suite published at agent-network-protocol.com: a technical white paper, an agent description protocol, an agent discovery protocol, the DID:WBA identity method (a did:web derivative), and a nine-part messaging profile ladder (core binding, discovery, direct and group messaging, direct and group end-to-end encryption, attachments, federation, mentions), with an agent communication meta-protocol and an agent payment protocol still in draft. Apache-2.0, driven by a community working group with bilingual English and Chinese documentation, currently at spec version 1.2 (1.0 and 1.1 archived). Working code exists around the spec: the anp implementation repository, an open DID server, npm packages under the @agent-network-protocol scope, and an mcp2anp bridge that turns MCP tools into ANP-advertised services.

Status
#

Active but unanswered by the market. The main repository (created 2024-10-23) shows 1,441 stars, 105 forks, and a push on 2026-10-01, with the companion anp repo at 351 stars and the spec hub serving ANP 1.2, all as of 2026-10-05 (GitHub API and the spec site). The community footprint is the weak signal: the only Hacker News stories are 2 points (2025-08) and 1 point (2025-11), and the only third-party comparative coverage I found is a 2026-02 survey published by the OSSA project, which scores ANP under 1 percent production use while promoting its own contract layer, so even the comparative source is self-interested. No enterprise platform ships ANP support; adoption evidence is confined to the project’s own examples, SDKs, and bridge tools.

Strengths
#

DID-based identity is a genuinely different answer to the trust problem: A2A verifies agent identity with signed Agent Cards inside enterprise trust, while DID:WBA wants cross-domain verification with no platform in the middle.
The messaging profile ladder is the most complete transport-and-encryption story in the category on paper, ending in federated, end-to-end encrypted group messaging that no rival spec even attempts.
The mcp2anp bridge is a pragmatic on-ramp: an MCP server’s tools can be advertised as ANP services, so adoption does not require abandoning MCP.
Versioned, archived specifications (1.0, 1.1, 1.2) show specification discipline most community protocols never reach.

Cautions
#

Adoption is near zero, and the parts that would make it matter have not moved: no harness, surface, or platform in this index speaks it, and its discussion footprint is three stories totaling 4 points.
The complexity budget is large: DID resolution, namespace specifications, nine messaging profiles, and two draft protocols are a lot of machinery for a network that does not exist yet.
The README carries a disclaimer that the project has issued no digital currency, an unusual line that hints at impersonation noise around the identity technology.
Governance is a single community working group with no foundation and no corporate backer on the order of A2A’s eight-company steering committee.

Pricing
#

Free and open under Apache-2.0, with nothing to buy. The cost is specification and implementation tracking across a broad, still-moving suite.

Compared to
#

A2A: the enterprise, platform-mediated counterpart; A2A has the coalition, the SDKs, and the production deployments, ANP has the decentralization. Choose A2A where platforms support it.
MCP: agent-to-tool rather than agent-to-agent, and the bridge makes them compose rather than compete.
ACP: editor-to-agent over local stdio, a different lane entirely from open-web discovery.

Bottom line
#

Recommended for researchers and builders prototyping open-web agent discovery, where ANP is the only developed option in this index. Not for production engineering teams today: use A2A where your platforms already speak it and MCP for tools. My disagreeable claim: if autonomous agents on the open web ever emerge, ANP’s DID-and-discovery design is a more likely base than A2A, but the probability that they emerge on either spec is the number to discount.

Changes
#

2026-10-05 - Created from the 2026-10-05 entrant scan (the decentralized agent-interop slot), with the thin adoption footprint recorded as the central caution.

References
#

https://github.com/agent-network-protocol/AgentNetworkProtocol - repository, 1,441 stars, Apache-2.0, activity as of 2026-10-05 (GitHub API)
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/agent-network-protocol/AgentNetworkProtocol/master/README.md - vision, protocol-suite framing, the digital-currency disclaimer
https://agent-network-protocol.com/ - spec hub: ANP 1.2 latest, 1.0 and 1.1 archived, core protocols and messaging profiles
https://agent-network-protocol.com/specs/1.2/white-paper - the ANP 1.2 technical white paper
https://api.github.com/orgs/agent-network-protocol/repos - the companion implementations (anp 351 stars, open-did-server, mcp2anp, anp-open-sdk), fetched 2026-10-05
https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/search?query=%22Agent%20Network%20Protocol%22&tags=story - the footprint scan: stories at 2, 1, and 1 points (2025-08 to 2026-01)
https://openstandardagents.org/research/agent-communication-protocol-survey/ - the only third-party comparative coverage found, itself published by a competing project (2026-02-20)

decentralized-identity on tomrochette.com

Agent Network Protocol (ANP)

What it is
#

Status
#

Strengths
#

Cautions
#

Pricing
#

Compared to
#

Bottom line
#

Changes
#

See also
#

References
#

decentralized-identity on tomrochette.com

Agent Network Protocol (ANP)

What it is #

Status #

Strengths #

Cautions #

Pricing #

Compared to #

Bottom line #

Changes #

See also #

References #

What it is
#

Status
#

Strengths
#

Cautions
#

Pricing
#

Compared to
#

Bottom line
#

Changes
#

See also
#

References
#