The Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard ranks LLMs by how often they hallucinate when summarizing short documents, scored by Vectara’s own HHEM hallucination-detection model.
It is the only member of this category that measures a single failure mode, factual inconsistency with a provided source, and the only one publishing a downloadable open variant of its judge model, though the published rankings are computed by that variant’s commercial successor.
What it is #
A GitHub repository carrying the ranked table, a Hugging Face Space rendering it interactively, and the judge question stated in the open: the README names HHEM-2.3, Vectara’s commercial hallucination-evaluation model, as the model computing the rankings, and offers HHEM-2.1-Open, an Apache-2.0 open variant, for download on Hugging Face and Kaggle. Each refresh runs a fixed set of short-document summarization tasks per model and reports hallucination rate, factual consistency rate, answer rate, and average summary length; the README table is stamped “Last updated on October 22, 2026” (as of 2026-10-25; the previous stamp read October 16, 2026), and the Space’s files were last modified 2026-10-06. HHEM judges whether a summary is supported by its source, and it targets the case the model card calls “factual but hallucinated”: an answer that is true in the world but contradicts the retrieved context. The work began at Vectara under Simon Hughes, who died in November 2023; the repository and model card both carry a memorial line, and Vectara has kept the leaderboard and the model updated since.
Status #
Active and notably adopted for its size: the repository holds 3,318 stars and 107 forks as of 2026-10-13, pushed 2026-10-23, and the Hugging Face Space shows 203 likes with files modified 2026-10-06. The judge model’s Hugging Face footprint is a rolling-window figure that swings both ways: the downloads counter read roughly 135,000 on 2026-10-13 and roughly 104,000 in the model’s rolling month as of 2026-10-31, with no release in between, so I refresh the number with its as-of date and read no trend into the swing. The 2023 launch footprint was substantial: the leaderboard thread drew 107 points on Hacker News in November 2023, and the author pointed to a New York Times feature the same month in the Show HN thread. The current leader is antgroup/finix_s1_32b at a 1.8 percent hallucination rate (README table, stamped 2026-10-22, unchanged leader across the September 22, October 16, and October 22 stamps, and still unchanged at this 2026-10-31 re-fetch).
Strengths #
- The number is the narrowest and most checkable in the category: one failure mode, one task family, and an open variant of the judge that anyone can download and rerun against their own summaries.
- The table lives in git, so every refresh is diffable and the history of who led when is preserved in commit history.
- The measurement has survived into practice: HHEM is used as a consistency guardrail in RAG pipelines, which is more production contact than most 2023-era eval artifacts can claim.
Cautions #
- One vendor’s model judges everyone else’s models, and the vendor sells RAG products whose value rises with hallucination anxiety.
- The published scores come from HHEM-2.3, a commercial model available only through Vectara’s platform, so the open model you can download (HHEM-2.1-Open) is an earlier variant, not the judge that produced the table.
- The task is one narrow slice: summarization of short documents, so a low rate here says nothing about tool use, agents, or long-context faithfulness.
- No published human validation or research paper grounds the scores: asked in the Show HN thread whether the rows carried human verification, the team answered that a paper might come “at some point” and pointed to some informal human validation of the original model, but nothing published validates the current table, so every score remains a model’s judgment twice over, an LLM summarizing and another model judging.
- The Answer Rate column exposes a gaming vector the board does not police: a model can lower its hallucination rate by answering less, and the table itself shows the trade (Phi-4 at an 80.7 percent answer rate against a 3.7 percent hallucination rate in the same row).
- Continuity now rests on a company rather than a person: updates continued after the founding author’s death, but the current maintainer set and process are undisclosed.
Pricing #
Free: the repository, the Space, and the HHEM-2.1-Open weights (an identity-gated download on Hugging Face) are public. No paid tier exists, so no price history applies.
Compared to #
- Artificial Analysis: broad multi-benchmark measurement with published weights and a dated changelog; Vectara is one metric, one task, one judge.
- LiveBench: objective ground-truth scoring on rotating questions; Vectara’s ground truth is a model’s judgment of consistency, not a verified answer.
- LLM Stats: aggregates many benchmarks into a composite; Vectara isolates the single failure mode RAG builders care about.
Bottom line #
Recommended as a directional hallucination-rate read before wiring RAG or summarization features, and as a downloadable judge for checking your own pipeline’s consistency; not as a general capability signal, and not as a reason to pick one model over another by a decimal point. My disagreeable claim: the Answer Rate column is the most interesting number on the board, because it quietly shows that some of the least-hallucinating models are the ones that abstain the most, and no other member of this category exposes that trade.
Changes #
- 2026-10-13 - Created from the 2026-10-13 entrant scan, with the model-judged-scores caution and the answer-rate trade as the critical angles.
- 2026-10-17 - Volatile re-verification after the repository’s 2026-10-17 push: the README table stamp moved to October 16, 2026 (from September 22), with the leader unchanged (antgroup/finix_s1_32b at 1.8 percent).
- 2026-10-31 - Rotation re-verification with every cited URL re-fetched live, and the judge record corrected: the README states the rankings are computed by HHEM-2.3, Vectara’s commercial model, with HHEM-2.1-Open as the downloadable open variant (this note and the matrix had framed the open model as the judge), the Show HN thread’s informal-human-validation answer folded into the caution, the stamp (October 22), leader, Space likes, and repository state all unchanged, and the judge model’s download count refreshed as a rolling window (roughly 104,000 as of 2026-10-31, down from roughly 135,000 on 2026-10-13, no release between).
See also #
- Artificial Analysis - the broad measurement layer this single-metric board complements
- LiveBench - the objective-ground-truth contrast to a model-judged consistency score
- LLM Stats - the aggregator that can carry a hallucination score as one input among many
- Trackers and Leaderboards Feature Matrix - the category comparison this note joins
References #
https://github.com/vectara/hallucination-leaderboard - repository and table: task definition, table columns, “Last updated on October 22, 2026” stamp, top rows, memorial line, and the HHEM-2.3 statement (“This leaderboard uses HHEM-2.3, Vectara’s commercial hallucination evaluation model, to compute the LLM rankings”, with HHEM-2.1-Open named as the open variant on Hugging Face and Kaggle) (re-fetched 200, 2026-10-31, stamp and leader unchanged)
https://api.github.com/repos/vectara/hallucination-leaderboard - exact counters (3,318 stars, 107 forks, Apache-2.0, created 2023-10-31, pushed 2026-10-23 as of 2026-10-25; star figure unchanged by policy) (re-fetched 200, 2026-10-31, unchanged)
https://huggingface.co/spaces/vectara/leaderboard - the interactive Space: 203 likes, files last modified 2026-10-06 (re-fetched 200, 2026-10-31, likes unchanged at 203)
https://huggingface.co/vectara/hallucination_evaluation_model - HHEM-2.1-Open model card: the factual-but-hallucinated definition, asymmetry, identity-gated download, memorial; the card names HHEM-2.3 as “our latest commercial hallucination detection model” powering the live leaderboard, platform-exclusive, and reports 103,620 downloads in the rolling month as of 2026-10-31 (fetched 200, 2026-10-13; re-fetched 200, 2026-10-31, the 2.3 statement and rolling downloads refreshed)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38167310 - the Show HN thread (65 points): the methodology exchange (model-judged, a paper deferred, “we did some human validation” of the original model left unpublished), the New York Times mention, author participation (fetched 200, 2026-10-13; re-fetched 200, 2026-10-31, unchanged)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38286761 - the November 2023 leaderboard thread (107 points), the launch footprint (fetched 200, 2026-10-13; re-fetched 200, 2026-10-31, unchanged)
https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/search?query=%22hallucination%20leaderboard%22&tags=story - the footprint search behind the community record (fetched 200, 2026-10-13; re-fetched 200, 2026-10-31, four stories, no new footprint of note)